|
|
| Author |
Message |
Swetha
Associate
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Location: India
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: Here is a SC Question... |
 |
|
Hey.... Here is a SC Question I came across... Try solving it guys... Cheers...
Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
A. that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
B. that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
C. that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
D. the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
E. making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ksvickram
Senior Consultant
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The error lies in the " are made " part of the sentence. Not able to guess what type of the error it is. But it sounds different / unnatural. It ought to be "should be made" or the like.
In B, there are two thats,
It seems that the sentence would not sound good w/o a that in it. So, I guess C would is the correct option. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
