Thanks indeed. The hidden fallacy lies in the nature of the function relating d and x.
There will be a loss if d>x/(1+x).
Shaji.
ksb wrote:
The given answer is correct.
It is easy if you use numbers to understand this question.
Let the cost be 100.
Let the mark up x be say, 40. Therefore, marked price is 140.
Let d be 40. Therefore, discount offered = 40% of 140 = 56. Hence, loss. i.e., d = x
Let d be 50. Therefore, discount offered = 50% of 140 = 70. Hence, loss. i.e., d > x
Let d be 30. Therefore, discount offered = 30% of 140 = 42. Hence, loss i.e., d < x.
Therefore, if we know that the merchant made a loss, we cannot conclusively state that d >= x. On the contrary, if we had known that d > = x, then we can conclusively state that there will be a loss.
Hope this clarifies.
KSB